<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Arthritic Awards</title>
	<link>http://www.theartsfuse.com/2008/05/17/our-arthritic-awards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.theartsfuse.com/2008/05/17/our-arthritic-awards/#comment-522</link>
		<author>Art</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theartsfuse.com/2008/05/17/our-arthritic-awards/#comment-522</guid>
					<description>An interesting question.  

Should there be a "No Award," like the Pulitzer sometimes does? 

I think even the Tony's a few years ago couldn't come up with a single nominee in one of the categories.

Although the award for Best Production rewards all the artists that have a part in the work. (Most of them have no say in the programming.) If Man of LaManch truly is the Best Production, then the team deserves the award, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting question.  </p>
<p>Should there be a &#8220;No Award,&#8221; like the Pulitzer sometimes does? </p>
<p>I think even the Tony&#8217;s a few years ago couldn&#8217;t come up with a single nominee in one of the categories.</p>
<p>Although the award for Best Production rewards all the artists that have a part in the work. (Most of them have no say in the programming.) If Man of LaManch truly is the Best Production, then the team deserves the award, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Thal</title>
		<link>http://www.theartsfuse.com/2008/05/17/our-arthritic-awards/#comment-532</link>
		<author>Ian Thal</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theartsfuse.com/2008/05/17/our-arthritic-awards/#comment-532</guid>
					<description>Even when I do see shows that are supposed to be "edgy" and cater to my gen-Xer (or younger) demographic, it's pretty hit or miss whether the "edginess" is anything but a pose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even when I do see shows that are supposed to be &#8220;edgy&#8221; and cater to my gen-Xer (or younger) demographic, it&#8217;s pretty hit or miss whether the &#8220;edginess&#8221; is anything but a pose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
